Strange Piece of Paradise
Book Review Submission
Author: Jentz
Title: Strange Piece of Paradise
Review:The book starts off in a wandering, misleading fashion, and then bites down onto the bone of the story. The climax, however, comes early - she is attacked. It is followed by denoument which oscillates in intensity but generally heads in decline. The decline of the remainder might be inevitable, due to the nature of the remaining content: what in most tales would be spent on a climax (the attack) is presented early. The ensuing hundreds of pages focus on painstaking and editable interviews. To her credit, many of these interviews are eye opening and well presented. The remaining action, the trial, is well placed at the end - but due to the nature of the event this is only partially satisfying - if read from a tale telling point of view. As history however it must simply be accepted. I'm not certain I - or anyone - could have offered a better organization. However having covered the weakest parts of the book, some of it's strengths were unforgiving details, and for the most part excellent use of language. As for difficult words, I have always been in the "look it up" camp, and tend to overlook misused grammar as the fault of the editor. (To which any self respecting editor would agree.) I have yet to meet a perfect grammarian. Overall, an excellent read with logistical flaws that would challenge any writer.
Name:Michael
Author: Jentz
Title: Strange Piece of Paradise
Review:The book starts off in a wandering, misleading fashion, and then bites down onto the bone of the story. The climax, however, comes early - she is attacked. It is followed by denoument which oscillates in intensity but generally heads in decline. The decline of the remainder might be inevitable, due to the nature of the remaining content: what in most tales would be spent on a climax (the attack) is presented early. The ensuing hundreds of pages focus on painstaking and editable interviews. To her credit, many of these interviews are eye opening and well presented. The remaining action, the trial, is well placed at the end - but due to the nature of the event this is only partially satisfying - if read from a tale telling point of view. As history however it must simply be accepted. I'm not certain I - or anyone - could have offered a better organization. However having covered the weakest parts of the book, some of it's strengths were unforgiving details, and for the most part excellent use of language. As for difficult words, I have always been in the "look it up" camp, and tend to overlook misused grammar as the fault of the editor. (To which any self respecting editor would agree.) I have yet to meet a perfect grammarian. Overall, an excellent read with logistical flaws that would challenge any writer.
Name:Michael
